maybe it's because my professor is just AWESOME... but in any case, i'm really beginning to enjoy dutch art. lemee give you some examples (click on images to enlarge)
Emmanuel de Witte (1617-1692), Interior of the Oude Kerk at Delft during a Sermon, 1651, oil on wood
after the summer of 06 when daddy, sam, and i went inside every single church & cathedral known to man in france, italy, and switzerland, i thought i'd be tired of looking at interiors of churches. but we studied de witte this past week and his ability to give new perspective just wowed me. true, he takes some liberty in manipulating the perspective a bit but in general he stays true to what he sees. in this one specifically, i like how he crops the top to mimic the round arches and force us to look not just at the architecture but at the event that is happening: a sermon. i love the stream of light that is coming in on the right side. i just like the study of light and shadow in general. and look how little those people are. teeeeeny tiny. that's how i felt when i entered the duomo cathedral in florence, the notre dame in paris, and all the other churches. ohmann.
Abraham van Beyeren (1620/21-1690), Still Life with a Silver Wine Jug, early 1660s, oil on canvas
this is the painting i will be writing my thousand page paper on for my dutch & flemish art class. haha. maybe just 10-15 pgs. the more i look at it, the more i fall in love with it. it's really a unique experience working so closely at the museum and really interacting with the works there. cleveland's incredibly lucky to have such great masterpieces. by 2012 everything will be open and it'll be one of the top museums... in the world! muhahhaa. anyway. back to the painting. for those of you who think still life is boring and real easy to do, i challenge you to look very closely at the brushwork. the lemon peel at the right, not exactly an easy feat. i don't even paint and i know that it takes a lot of work to create the textures on the lemon and the twisting peel. the reflections found in the silver wine jug is of another note. look carefully and
you'll find the artist's self-portrait. not as obvious as clara peeter's still life. Her self-portrait can be found eight times in the pokal on the right. hers is more skillfully rendered whereas van beyeren subtly hints at his presence. dutch still life is all about the riches they were able to acquire through trade: the chinese porcelain bowl on the right, lemons from the mediterranean, other fruits probably from italy, greece, etc., even though wine was considered a necessity in the diet, it was still expensive and meant that only the rich could afford it. this obvious, opulent arrangement of objects is not mere coincidence but purposeful. and i tend to agree with scholars when they say that still life, even without the human form, does imply human presence and portray a narrative. but i'll say more about this in my paper instead of here. =)
i thiiiiiiink i'm done talking about this and actually get started on that paper. hehe.

